TeamDynamics
Sign inStart now

People & coaching

Amazone Exec Team

Coaching your team

Choose a dimension, ask about a real situation, and agree one useful adjustment.

Invite people to discuss only the parts of their CoDynamics they feel comfortable exploring together.

Manager guide

Help your team make the most of its TeamDynamics

Supercharge your impact: As a manager, the greatest leverage comes from improving the effectiveness of your team. Putting your TeamDynamics into practice will help you do just that.

Start with understanding: Make sure everybody on your team knows both their TeamDynamics and which behaviors are more or less natural for them as individuals. Discuss your TeamDynamics as a group and follow up in subsequent team meetings and 1:1s.

Evolve over time: Revisit your TeamDynamics on a regular cadence as things change, like team composition (people joining or departing), team structure (changes in roles and responsibilities) or the organizational context (rapid growth, new company objectives, etc). Reevaluating your TeamDynamics every 6 months is a good starting point, though quarterly and annually also work for some teams.

Lead the charge where you’re uniquely positioned to do so

Make it explicit: Add your TeamDynamics to new hire onboarding documentation/user guides, cross-team project kickoffs, and internal profiles/directories. Communicate your TeamDynamics to external collaborators too, so they know what to expect from your team.

Update your norms: Your team will have great ideas about how to work together better based on your TeamDynamics. Incorporate these insights into your existing norms and processes — like weekly meetings, planning cycles, professional development, and so on — to put your results into practice.

See around corners: Help your team identify when it’s time to deviate from your team’s natural preferences. Acknowledge the change, explain the circumstances, and set clear expectations.

Translate for other teams: Your team likely works with many others; you probably have a decent hypothesis about these other groups’ TeamDynamics (or you can encourage them to take the assessment). Coach your team on what you have observed about how their TeamDynamics likely interact with yours.

Working with individuals’ CoDynamics

This web report shows named participants’ natural fit and potential tension in each dimension. Use the overview to prepare practical support and the coaching guidance to plan a conversation.

CoDynamics describe personal working preferences. Invite each person to choose which experiences and details they want to discuss in a group or one-to-one conversation. Make room for sharing without requiring it.

Help all CoDynamics be successful. Just as there is no such thing as a better set of TeamDynamics, individuals can be successful regardless of how naturally their preferences align with their TeamDynamics. The key is knowing how to support them (you’ll find more detailed coaching recommendations tailored for your TeamDynamics in this Manager Report):

Where individuals are natural fits, coach them to look out for scenarios where the team’s natural TeamDynamics might not be most applicable and they should flex their behaviors.

Where individuals are in tension, watch for and create opportunities where their natural preferences would make them uniquely suited to succeed. Encourage them to step up and shine.

Processing

Your team’s approach: Logical

Natural fit

8 team members

Jeff B., Alex R., Jordan M., Taylor S., Morgan L., Casey N., Sam K., Avery P.

What to ask

Whose experience or context could change our reading of this evidence?

What to try

Ask someone with relevant expertise to challenge the interpretation alongside the analysis.

Suggested talking points

Use these words to start a conversation with this group.

Not everyone on the team may share your analysis-first approach to interpreting information. Help the more relationship-driven individuals on our team by sharing with them past examples of how we analyzed information as a team, so they can understand what works best in our context.

While it’s great to ground so much of our thinking in rigorous reasoning and analysis, sometimes the most consequential input comes from specific individuals who have unique expertise, context, and influence. Let’s remind ourselves to seek out and incorporate their perspectives when we’re gathering insights.

Potential tension

1 team member

Riley C.

What to ask

Which examples would help you see how the team evaluates evidence?

What to try

Review a past analysis together and connect relevant people’s context to the evidence.

Suggested talking points

Use these words to start a conversation with this group.

When you’re interpreting data and information, ask your teammates (or me) for past examples of how we did so as a team, so you can understand the types of analytical approaches that work best in our context.

Your natural tendency to look for and turn to individuals who have unique expertise or context can augment — though it won’t replace — our team’s naturally rigorous analytical approach. Help cover our team’s blind spots by reminding us which individuals have the most influence in each domain and make sure we’re weighing their input appropriately.

Saved resultFebruary 9, 20249 completed responsesParticipating manager

Turn the example into your result

Give your team a clearer way to work.

Add the exact roster once. Every participant gets secure access, private CoDynamics guidance, and a shared path from insight to action.

Pro · $39 / user · one timeInvite your teamCompare all products