You and your team
Your CoDynamics compare your own working preferences with your team's habits.
Alex R.’s CoDynamics.
What matches. What differs.
Matches the team: Processing, Deciding
Differs from the team: Communicating, Executing
Potential tension means a different preference. It is useful context for finding support, not a judgment of suitability or ability to succeed.
Select a dimension to go to its guidance.
Your preferenceInformalInformation is shared organically among team members.
Team behavior you describedOrderedInformation is shared through defined processes and forums.
Your preferenceLogicalInformation is evaluated on its own merits, regardless of source.
Team behavior you describedLogicalInformation is evaluated on its own merits, regardless of source.
Your preferenceAuthoritativeDecisions are driven by direction from team leadership.
Team behavior you describedAuthoritativeDecisions are driven by direction from team leadership.
Your preferenceDeliberatePlans are thorough, closely followed, and regularly updated.
Team behavior you describedSpontaneousLightweight plans favor agility and adaptability.
How to read your fit
Natural fit means your preferences align with the team's approach. These situations may feel more comfortable.
Potential tension means you prefer a different approach. Recognizing these situations helps you prepare and ask for support.
Your preferenceLogical
Team pattern describedVery strongly Logical
You instinctively rely on rigorous reasoning in advancing your perspectives in a way that is natural to your team
- Show more relationship-driven teammates several examples of analysis the team has used well. Explain what made each useful: the evidence, reasoning, and level of detail the team expected. These examples give them a practical way to contribute to the team’s discussions.
- If there are specific experts on the team who have context, knowledge or abilities that uniquely fit the information at hand, it may be both faster and more effective to rely on their judgment, rather than applying the team’s typical approach of building a broadly understood analytical framework to guide the interpretation
Use the evidence already at hand
You describe the team’s Processing style as Logical; you prefer Logical. If two options are being discussed and relevant evidence is already available, the team’s analytical approach can help make the choice concrete.
Try this: In your next recommendation, compare the two options using one piece of evidence already available. Say what it supports and what it does not tell you.
Look for: The discussion identifies a specific reason to prefer an option, or a specific question still unanswered.
Explore this practiceTeamDynamics Solo
See your team more clearly. Find your next step.
Complete one assessment to get TeamDynamics from your perspective and private CoDynamics. Explore both online and download a PDF of each. No teammate invitations needed.