The right assessment tool depends on the question you need to answer. Evaluating a candidate’s job skills, understanding employee feedback, and planning a team discussion are different tasks. Start there before comparing features or buying a report.
This guide retains ten assessment options and two additional tools, grouped by their intended use. It is a practical shortlist, not a ranking based on employer usage, effectiveness, or sales. Product packages change, so inspect the current reports and delivery format with the provider.
Choose the purpose before the assessment
| Your question | Category to examine | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| What evidence supports a hiring decision? | Job-relevant skills or selection assessments | Intended use, role relevance, accessibility, and interpretation |
| How do employees experience work? | Employee feedback and engagement platforms | Survey scope, confidentiality, reporting and follow-up |
| What can colleagues learn about themselves? | Preferences, talents, styles or trait assessments | Framework, report scope, sharing choices and team tools |
| How does this team work together? | Shared team behavior assessment | Whose perspective contributes and how discussion becomes action |
A tool designed for development is not automatically suitable for employee selection. In particular, TeamDynamics is for collaboration and development; the MBTI provider excludes hiring, job placement, and team assignment. Keep the decision’s purpose explicit.
#1. Predictive Index: behavioral insights for workplace applications
PI Behavioral Assessment examines individual workplace drives. PI also has a separate Cognitive Assessment, so the behavioral instrument should not be described as measuring cognitive ability. Its broader platform includes hiring, leadership, and team-development products.
Check the specific instrument, reporting package, and intended use. If you want team development, inspect the provider’s team tools rather than assuming the offering ends at individual results. Our PI team-building guide is a related starting point.
#2. TestGorilla: candidate assessments and skills evidence
TestGorilla offers a recruiting platform with assessment and skills-testing products. The relevant question is what evidence a particular test provides about the role’s requirements. Review the current test library and delivery options instead of relying on an old catalog count.
A hiring assessment is a different conversation from a development session with an existing team. Evaluate the selection process on its own terms; do not present a team-development tool as a substitute for job-relevant evidence.
#3. TeamDynamics: shared team working habits
TeamDynamics measures shared team behaviors across Communicating, Processing, Deciding, and Executing. In Pro, participants describe how the team works; completed responses contribute to the shared result. Personal preferences separately inform private CoDynamics and do not determine the team profile.
Use it when a manager or facilitator wants to discuss recurring collaboration patterns: how updates travel, how information is evaluated, who makes decisions, and how plans become action. Pro includes a Team Profile and an interactive Team Discussion Guide, alongside participant and manager outputs.
TeamDynamics Pro costs $39 per participant, once. Solo costs $29 once for one person’s view of their team. Choose the product around whose perspective you need and the conversation you want to hold.
#4. Culture Amp: employee feedback and development
Culture Amp is an employee experience platform covering engagement, performance, and development. Its feedback and reporting tools help organizations explore how employees experience work. This is a different measurement purpose from personality preferences or reported team working habits.
Before choosing, ask which surveys and reports you need, how confidentiality is handled, and who will own follow-up. A survey is most useful when the organization can discuss its findings and act on the issues it surfaces.
#5. CliftonStrengths: individual talent themes
CliftonStrengths, formerly StrengthsFinder, describes individual talent themes. Top 5 highlights five leading themes; CliftonStrengths 34 provides the full ranking. Gallup also offers Team Grid guidance for strengths conversations.
Use the themes to ask how someone applies a talent to current work. Keep role decisions grounded in skills, experience, interests, and task requirements. See the CliftonStrengths manager’s guide for practical activities.
Your next step
Discover how your team works. Build a plan to make it work better.
Spot what helps your team succeed—and what gets in the way. Get practical next steps for clearer communication, better decisions, and stronger teamwork.
#6. Everything DiSC: behavioral styles and relationships
Everything DiSC describes individual preferences and tendencies through D, i, S, and C styles. People can show a blend. Workplace learning and Catalyst group tools support applying those insights together.
Generic DiSC products vary by provider. Confirm the report and platform you are buying, then use examples to discuss adapting communication. Our DiSC manager’s guide includes small- and large-group exercises.
#7. MBTI: individual personality preferences
MBTIonline Teams includes the Myers-Briggs assessment, individual and team reports, a shared portal, and guided learning. The model describes preferences across four pairs; it does not measure job skills or establish which role someone should hold.
Use it for development and discussion of differences. The provider states that MBTI is not intended for hiring, job placement, or team assignments. Compare its actual team offering with the conversation you want to run, rather than treating all personality tools as identical.
#8. Big Five: a trait framework with multiple instruments
The Big Five is a framework, not one universal test or vendor. It describes Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. The IPIP factor markers illustrate one set of measures; some instruments use labels such as Intellect or Emotional Stability.
Check the instrument, scales, intended use, and report interpretation. The Big Five manager’s guide explains how to use voluntary discussion without turning trait scores into job assignments.
#9. HIGH5: strengths reflection
HIGH5 offers a strengths test with a free starting result and additional report and team offerings. Inspect what is included at the level you choose; a free individual result does not imply that all reports or team services are free.
A practical discussion can ask where a strength has helped on a recent project and what support would help someone use it. Do not infer competence or a required job role solely from a strength label.
#10. 16Personalities: the NERIS framework
16Personalities uses its own NERIS framework. Although the type-code format looks familiar, it is distinct from the official MBTI assessment. It has free individual results and other offerings; confirm the current report scope.
Use a result as a reflective starting point and ask participants what fits their experience. When comparing tools, name the actual framework so readers do not mistake similar letters for the same assessment.
Two additional tools: Dimensional and Crystal
Dimensional offers a personality app for exploring yourself and relationships with others. If you are considering it for work, review the actual features and how participants would share information. Its stated individual and social use is different from a shared team behavior assessment.
Crystal now presents an AI coaching platform drawing on personality insights. Its current offering goes beyond the older description of a simple communication-profile tool. Inspect the intended audience, inputs, and coaching workflow rather than treating inferred personality guidance as established fact about a colleague.
Inspect the report and plan the session
- Write one question. For example: how can we improve project handoffs?
- Choose the unit of analysis. Decide whether you need a person’s preferences, employee feedback, skills evidence, or a shared team result.
- Inspect the outputs. Review sample reports, team tools, access and any facilitation requirements.
- Check participation and costs. Confirm which participants and reports are included and how personal information will be handled.
- Plan follow-through. Name an owner and review date for an agreement made during the session.
Choose around the teamwork you want to improve
If your next conversation is about shared working habits, preview the discussion slides before choosing an assessment. Use them to connect a team result with a concrete agreement.
You can combine perspectives when they serve a clear purpose. A talent discussion might explore how colleagues contribute; a shared behavior discussion might establish where decisions are recorded. Keep both conversations tied to the work and evaluate the actions you try.
